Effie Williams 
As the US Presidential election draws closer, the country is abuzz with the latest poll results. Two of the recent polls conducted by Marquette and Monmouth show Clinton leading Trump, but only by a narrow margin. Marquette puts Clinton three points ahead of Trump, while Monmouth shows a five-point lead. But what do these numbers really mean? Let’s dive into the details and explore the implications of these poll results.
Firstly, it is important to understand the sample size and composition of these polls. Marquette surveyed 800 likely voters in Wisconsin, while Monmouth spoke to 406 registered voters in Pennsylvania. Both polls had a margin of error of +/- 3.5 percentage points. This means that the results could be off by up to 3.5 points in either direction.
Furthermore, the demographics of the surveyed population could impact the poll results. Marquette’s sample consisted of 36% Democrats, 33% Republicans, and 27% Independents, while Monmouth’s had 42% Democrats, 39% Republicans, and 19% Independents. These figures show that more Democrats were surveyed in both polls, which could contribute to Clinton’s lead.
Moreover, the timing of the polls could also be a factor. Marquette surveyed voters from August 25 to 28, while Monmouth’s poll was conducted from August 25 to 28. These polls were taken after the Democratic National Convention ended, and they might reflect a boost in support for the Democratic nominee after the convention.
Another factor to consider is the “undecided” voters. Marquette’s poll showed that 9% of likely voters were still undecided, and Monmouth’s poll showed 11% of registered voters were undecided. These undecided voters could still swing the results in either direction and are crucial in the final outcome of the election.
Furthermore, it is vital to analyze the geographic and demographic breakdowns of the polls. Marquette’s poll shows that Clinton leads by a significant margin in Milwaukee and Madison, while Trump performs better in rural areas. Monmouth’s poll shows that Clinton leads by a considerable margin in Philadelphia and its suburbs, while Trump has a slight edge in the rest of the state. These results highlight the importance of state-level polls, which would ultimately determine the allocation of electoral votes.
The latest poll results have shown Clinton leading Trump by a narrow margin, but it is essential to understand the nuances and limitations of these polls. The sample size, composition, timing, undecided voters, and geographic breakdowns are all critical factors that can impact the results. Ultimately, the election will be decided by the winners in the battleground states, and state-level polls will provide more accurate insights into the final outcome. As the election approaches, we can expect to see more polls, and it is important to understand them thoroughly before drawing any conclusions.
About Author
